Photo by Vanessa Coleman
Cedomir Malgieri
Stanford University
I am a PhD Candidate in Economics at Stanford University.
My primary research field is Macroeconomics.
My primary research field is Macroeconomics.
I am on the 2024-2025 academic job market.
You can find my CV here.
You can reach me at cedomir@stanford.edu.
References
Prof. Luigi Bocola (co-primary advisor)
lbocola@stanford.edu
Prof. Patrick Kehoe (co-primary advisor)
pkehoe@stanford.edu
Prof. Adrien Auclert
aauclert@stanford.edu
Prof. Elena Pastorino
epastori@stanford.edu
Prof. Christopher Tonetti
tonetti@stanford.edu
JOB MARKET PAPER
Wage Contracts and Financial Frictions with Luca Citino
Financial crises often lead to drastic reductions in firms' access to credit, impacting significantly their ability to finance their operations. This paper shows that firms can partly offset the effects of these shocks by optimally adjusting their wage bills. We augment a baseline financial frictions model to account for two well-documented features of the labor market: wages are set at the firm level and within long-term employment relationships. Because of these features, wage dynamics depend on the financial conditions of firms, reflecting a trade-off between smoothing wages of risk-averse workers and investing in capital. We validate the model predictions on wage dynamics using matched employer-employee data from Italy. We find that more constrained firms adjust wages more in response to idiosyncratic shocks. In addition, firms that suffer the most during recessions back-load wages by offering steeper wage-tenure profiles to their workers. When matching these statistics with our general equilibrium model, we find that these wage adjustments reduce the sensitivity of output to financial shocks by 20%: wage back-loading enhances investment and job creation while improving allocative efficiency. We conclude by studying policies aimed at reducing inputs cost during recessions. Our findings show that these wage adjustments diminish the effectiveness of temporary payroll subsidies while enhancing the effectiveness of temporary investment subsidies in stimulating output.
WORKING PAPERS
Fiscal Multipliers and Phillips Curves with a Consumption Network with Francesco Beraldi
R&R at American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics
We show that households spend their marginal and their average dollar differently across sectors. Crucially, marginal expenditure is biased toward sectors employing high-MPC workers, revealing a new redistribution channel that benefits high-MPC households during expansions. We build a Multi-Sector, Two-Agent, New Keynesian model with non-homothetic preferences consistent with these findings. The new redistribution channel increases the fiscal multiplier by 10pp compared to an equivalent homothetic economy. The model also predicts steeper Phillips curves in sectors with high-MPC workers, a result we validate empirically with a novel identification strategy. The implied sectoral wage dynamics strengthen the redistribution towards high-MPC households and raise the inflationary impact of the shock by over 70 percent.
Risk Markups with Sebastian Di Tella and Christopher Tonetti
Optimal policy in an economy with misallocation depends on the origin of markups. We develop a model of heterogeneous markups generated by uninsurable persistent idiosyncratic risk. Entrepreneurs hire labor trading off expected profits against risk. Markups arise as compensation for risk and create misallocation. We study the constrained-efficient allocation of a planner who can use a uniform labor tax and time-zero lump- sum transfers. The optimal keep rate equals the product of (1) the aggregate markup and (2) workers’ consumption share divided by their Pareto weight. The markup component reflects inefficient risk premia that could be improved with a labor subsidy. The consumption-share component reflects inefficient precautionary saving that could be improved with a labor tax. In the long-run, the precautionary-saving component dominates and the optimal policy is a tax with a keep rate equal to workers’ consumption divided by labor income.
WORK IN PROGRESS
Are Wages Too Rigid? Wage Setting Externalities in a Credit Crunch
Wage rigidity and credit crunches are both important drivers of macroeconomic fluctuations. Recent research suggests that wage rigidity can amplify the effects of a credit crunch by making firms more vulnerable to a credit tightening. This paper studies constrained efficiency in economies with endogenous wage rigidity and aggregate financial shocks, finding that wages are too flexible rather than too rigid. Wage rigidity arises from bilaterally efficient negotiations between firms and risk-averse workers, yet this leads to a suboptimal allocation. During a credit crunch, firms reduce wages to free up resources for investment, but this creates a pecuniary externality: lower wages reduce household savings, raising borrowing costs in general equilibrium. The constrained efficient allocation can be implemented with payroll subsidies during financial crises, a commonly used stabilization policy.
The Puzzle of the Labor Wedge: a New Business Cycle Accounting Framework with Patrick Kehoe and Elena Pastorino
The labor wedge, defined as the deviation in the first-order condition for static labor supply in the growth model, plays a much larger role in explaining output fluctuations in the United States than in Europe. This is puzzling given the generally higher flexibility of U.S. labor markets compared to European ones. We propose an alternative accounting framework where labor markets are frictional and matches between firms and workers are governed by long-term contracts. This framework aims to reconcile the observed discrepancy between the contribution of the labor wedge in explaining recessions and the strength of labor market frictions across countries. A frictionless model misinterprets credit shocks as productivity shocks, particularly in European economies during the Great Recession.
Labor Force Participation of the Elderly: Crowding-in or Crowding-out? with Andrea Cerrato
In recent decades, many developed countries have seen a significant increase in labor force participation among individuals aged 55 and above. This labor market shift has raised questions about its impact on younger workers. We show that rising educational attainment is a key driver of this trend. Higher education levels correlate with extended work participation, and newer cohorts of older individuals are notably more educated than previous ones. Isolating the effect of education on labor force participation, we find that increased participation among the elderly, driven by education, positively impacts young workers by increasing wages and reducing unemployment. Our analysis, supported by descriptive evidence using O*NET data, suggests that young workers and college-educated older workers complement each other in production, explaining the observed crowding-in effects.